I haven't ever tried to test with that many items, frankly. I didn't build the function to be efficient at that level.
You could take a look at how the function works and probably come up with something more workable for your special case. It's really just a GetListItems followed by an UpdateListItems on that set of items. My guess is that the batch is simply too big at your number of items.
If you come up with anytrhing that you think would be a general improvement, please let me know.
M.
You could take a look at how the function works and probably come up with something more workable for your special case. It's really just a GetListItems followed by an UpdateListItems on that set of items. My guess is that the batch is simply too big at your number of items.
If you come up with anytrhing that you think would be a general improvement, please let me know.
M.